Wednesday, February 22, 2006

Shocks!: Daniel Craig not Bond Material?


After the acquisition of MGM by Sony, the company and the producers of the long famous secret agent 007 have ditched Pierce Brosnan and hired, instead, a new nobody by the name of Daniel Craig.

Whilst the decision is entirely to the producers and the company behind the production, fans worldwide schmucked at the new wannabe secret pretender by starting now a new website dubbed CraigNotBond.com.

The website has hit immense popularity amongst fans worldwide who disclosed their opinions about individual to do Her Majesty's bidding through MI-6.

There is clear frustration in the minds of fans of which the site quotes: "How can a short, blond actor with the rough face of a professional boxer and a penchant for playing killers, cranks, cads and gigolos pull off the role of a tall, dark, handsome and suave secret agent?"

Are you a Bond fan? What is your theory/opinion about this whole issue?

2 comments:

One Nine Seven One said...

Blond Bond? Yuk!

Perhaps they should make the next bond ARAB

and the one after that AFRO- AMERICAN

and the next one GAY

and the one after that a WOMAN.

Sorry but Bond is and shall always be a British dude with dark hair and good-looks. Not that ugly blond troll looking guy. This is the natural order of the Universe.

Sleepless In Muscat said...

lool...

this is the natural order of the universe

i couldn't agree more