Let's be completely frank; I seriously think that we have the worst people in the authoritative positions here in Oman, especially in some governmental positions.
I seriously do.
Here's why..
The Under-Secretary of Ministry of Regional Municipalities, Environment & Water has just announced that the ministry had signed an agreement with a company to draw up a plan to establish a damn in the Wadi Udai and Qurum areas, that were devastatingly hit in the last drench of scattered showers on Muscat not so long ago (please refer to links).
Oman has always had it's share of rains ever since it rained on the old Muttrah corniche area in the 1890s and made a river out of it (source: theweek). But back then, we had the excuse that we didn't have the technology to help us provide the necessary solutions to avoid such natural disasters.
Now, fast forward 36 years into the renaissance and keep in mind that we still have our seasonal scattered showers every few years.. you would think, that even the most basic logical even temporary solution would suggest that you take care of the problem until a more permanent solution is put into place to be acted upon in the opportune moment.
But to think that it took them 36 years of going through the same catastrophe over and over again just to make that move; it makes me think 'God help us when they do start on the actual projects if and when they do'.
I mean, it's not that I am against the very idea of them creating idea - quite the contrary - I am very much for it, but what puzzles me is why it took them so damn long to come up with that simple solution and avoided losing all that money, all that effort, all those poor souls' lives?
Another issue in Oman that is clearly one of the oldest and requires much attention is the issue of the rise of tobacco being used by the Sultanate's population (see links) that has risen up to 23% (23% men; 2-3% women, 1 in every 5 school students is a smoker) in the last few years.
Most of you who read that small percentage and shrug off their shoulders to dismiss the importance and significance of this fact when in fact what should also concern you also is the fact that 75% of Oman's population is under the age of 21 which is alarming because this means that most of the smokers in Oman are still in their young age of youth.
What's ironic though, is the fact is that there was a legislation passed by the government banning smoking in two phases; the first of which was to ban it in governmental and official buildings, whilst the second phase was supposed to focus on banning it in public places such as restaurants, cafe's, areas where toddlers and children alike could spend most of their time - alas, though, this second phase never got to being passed.
As non-smokers in the Muscat area we were hoping that we would see smoking being banned in all manners and forms that it could ever come across but then that was one sweet dream. Now, the government through the Ministry of Health is sounding the alarm because it can't put a curb on the habit or stop it from being marketed? Sounds like an April fool's joke out either too late or too early to me.
There are lots of ways to make this work; create a solid law that bans selling any type of tobacco to a minor under the age of 21 and if such a case was found then a big hefty fine is in need against the establishment or prosecution.
The matter of waging a war against tobacco in Oman isn't just financial, it could also be political as the people behind the tobacco industry in Oman have some political ties that link up with other retail outlets in Oman that offer many jobs to Omanis. Kind of a blackmail issue if you want to look at it that way.
Marketing the products is something that is up to the people that require the money like the local theatres that would gracefully open their arms to anyone who would help in paying their extra bills through advertising on their screens, and as a fact, the tobacco companies such as Marlboro pay big sums of money to get their 'flavor' across the screens with the traditional small font warning that it is a direct cause to lung cancer. While the world is alarmed at how Walkman headphones could seriously damage a human being's sense of hearing.
Doesn't that make your blood boil?
---
Links:
- Under-Secretary of Ministry of Regional Muncipalities, Environment & Water announces plans for construction of damns in the Muscat area (Arabic only)
- Sultanate's battle against tobacco needs teeth
- Ministry of Regional Municipalities, Environment & Water Resources
Sunday, January 07, 2007
and the 'de de de' award goes to..
Posted by Sleepless In Muscat at 01:28
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
10 comments:
lol
its simple really..
who holds these positions...? Men.
and men are generally what...? SLOW.
lol
I am curently out of Oman so I havnt seen how bad it is!!!
but from the pictures I have seen I know that Oman must improve its sewer system!!!
since by the looks of the weather it is gona be normal in Oman to have heavy rains every winter!! since the weather is changing due to global warming!!!
I get the feeling that the gulf is gona be green!!!
As for smoking I think they should band it compleatly on public area's
Anonymous:
not only does your comment show how much of a sexist you are, but it also proves that the amount of intelligence you hold is no greater than that of a rock.
If you thought twice before you published that comment, you would realize that - in your philosophy - this would also mean that none of the Arab rulers should rule our countries.
Don't you think that's a bit far fetched?
Red Dragon:
Tell me about it. I mean, they should have thought of the sewage system solution a long time back but it just goes to show that there's too much bureaucracy in this country to get around of.
As of smoking, I detest it to the very fiber.
sewage part.. very true.
tobacoo part... rules is not only the way to stop it.. education counts more.. proper campaigns should take place.. the attitude should change.. not the behaviour only.. thats my opinion..
DoTs...:
I agree with you on that part. Education plays a great role in helping out with enforcing rules that must be applied in order for the public to understand the dangers and consequences that come along with the disease-like-spread of such a hobby as smoking.
The plan to finally build dams to stop the flooding in Qurm has absolutely nothing to do with the need of the city. The reason the government is finally going ahead with this is because they found an investor who is willing to invest gobs of money into building a huge mall along with hotel, office building and cinema, smack in the middle of Wadi Al Qurum.
http://www.dailystaregypt.com/article.aspx?ArticleID=1716
well done. totally agree with u. how many years has it been that the main road in front of Harthy has been destroyed due to the flooding wadi. and every year they pay big money to repair and rebuild. and here i am brought up to think that il wiqaya 5airun min il 3ilaj (avoidance is better than repair or something like that)
Muscati:
Thank you for the information and the link. But that makes matters worse.
Think about it this way; this would mean that the government would not have done anything about the ongoing flooding problem that happens every now and then had it not been for this investor.
Doesn't this profile an image of recklessness in planning?
3anooda:
Thank you.
And you're right about the dumb 'repair and rebuild' issue that we have to go through everytime there's a heavy rain shower in Muscat.
The people upstairs really need to get their act in position.
If you take a course in decision making, one of the typical examples they use about forming decision trees involves one about a town that experiences flooding. In the example you are given statistics about how often it rains, how often it floods, the extent of the damage it causes, how much it costs to fix the damage, and how much it would cost to find a solution that stops the floods from causing damage. Your task is to determine whether or not the town should invest in the solution.
In Oman, Muscat Municipality has looked at 35 years of rain fall statistics and decided that the cost of building dams to stop the flooding in Qurum is way too high in comparison to the cost of repairing the damage whenever it floods, which on average happen every 3 to 4 years. The worst damage is caused in Amerat and Wadi Adai, so they invested in new roads there about 5 years ago and now they don't get affected by floods as badly as they used to in the past.
And by the way, the Egyptian investor for the Wadi Al Qurum project is apparently putting up part of the cost of the dams himself.
Muscati:
I still think, even though that Muscat Municipality has done the math along the last 35 years, that setting up a damn would have really help the people who live in these areas avoid the catastrophes even though the fact still stands that they only happen every 3-4 years.
Post a Comment